|
Consumer
protection is a luxury
B.Vaidyanathan
The bitter truth about
the consumer movement in this country is that the government, managed by
its clueless bureaucracy and headed by uncommitted politicians is definitely
not what it should have been, after all the initiatives that were taken during
the 80s, 90s and the beginning of this century. One of the major reason
is the consumer groups themselves, who are by and large happy with being
some office-bearer or having the access to the government or its goodies.
In spite of this, a visionary like late P.V.Narasimha Rao, who was instrumental
in liberalising the Indian economy and introducing an apolitical Manmohan
Singh to the Indian political leadership, had the time and commitment to
participate in one of the Central Consumer Protection Council meetings in
1990 (“The success of the economy depended on the consumer movement.”
– P.V.Narasimha Rao, at the inauguration of the X CCPC Meeting),
at New Delhi and yet another consumer conclave, organised at his clearance,
yet again in New Delhi, in 1994 (“It is not the job of the government
to sustain the consumer movement – movements will have to be sustained by
the people.”– P.V.Narasimha Rao).
It is seven decades since we are governing ourselves.
But why our country resembles a banana republic quite often? Those
in power never seem to realise that they are accountable to the people –
the tax payer, because of whose contribution the country is kept alive and
kicking. Otherwise, how anyone can justify the total inaction
and indifference when the Consumer Protection Rules were amended in 2006,
to castrate the consumer movement, which was already on its crutches.
It is understood that the then Union Minister for Food, Civil Supplies and
Consumer Protection, felt embarrassed that ordinary consumer activists were
questioning the government actions/inactions and hence wanted to put an end
to the elaborate Central Consumer Protection Council meetings. Thus,
without any consultation or deliberation with the consumer groups, the Rules
were amended without much publicity. This instance amply demonstrates
how well the bureaucracy can dance to the tunes of the political class without
any inhibition, thereby even subverting the purpose for which the Department
exists, at the cost of the taxpayers’ contribution.
In a banana republic, powerful corporates, military
and the rich are supposed to call the shots, thereby making the life of
the underprivileged all the more difficult and challenging.
Is it not something similar happening in our country?
Is it not those with the muscle power (In Feb. 16, jat quota protests
in Haryana, not only crippled that State, but affected the national capital
as well.), manpower (During Jan.-Feb. 16, the entire state administration
of Tamilnadu, went into a tailspin, as the well paid government employees
went on strike, demanding more and more.), or financial power (Well catered
Bank employees resort to strikes and arm twisting tactics, at the drop of
the hat.), resort to such blackmailing and domination so as to get done what
they want?
Though the country is performing well in various fields
of scientific, industrial and economic growth, the major area of concern
is the near indifference of the political class and their lack of accountability.
Ironically, in our country, the accountability appear to stop with the ruling
party politicians alone. Whereas, in a multiparty democracy, there
are umpteen parties outside than the ones which is entrusted with the governance.
As long as this anomaly is not addressed, those in the opposition benches
are likely to go scot free after contributing successfully to obstacles
for better governance. When you super impose this on the clueless
bureaucracy, many of whom are hardly equipped to tackle the issues thrown
at them with sincerity, what results is disaster of humungous proportions.
To add to all these is their high-handed behaviour, as though they are from
the heaven and are incapable of doing anything wrong! This tragedy
is sustained due to the tolerant and ‘sub chalta hai’ attitude of
majority of our people who are totally ingrained with ‘dharma, ahimsa,
bhagwan dekhega’ attitude.
These days, Consumer Protection,
as an issue is hardly discussed, though highlighting of individual consumer
issues/resident problems are regularly seen in the print and electronic media.
The biggest saviour of the common man is technology, especially the Information
Technology, because of which right from railway reservation to payment of
municipal taxes, have become more transparent and the middle man has been
eliminated. The online shopping, ever increasing competition have
all come to the rescue of the consumer, in spite of the mindless bureaucracy
and an indifferent political class. Anyhow, the electronic media, though
without much expertise, have been able to highlight consumer problems, and
many a times the indifferent government is being induced into action, as
a fire fighting department will do. Systemic initiatives getting substituted
by TRP driven media. What a colossal injustice? After all, consumers
and consumer activists should not expect anything better in an administration
which is more tuned to crisis management, and whose sensitivities are dictated
by muscle, man and financial power.
********
(The author
is the Chief Mentor, Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela)
********
|