advantageconsumer.com
Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela |
|
|
General Insurance
1. Insurance Company should compensate National
Commission, New Delhi S. Bhagat
Singh
--- Petitioner 2. To constitute a loss within the meaning of a fire policy, is sufficient that the loss has been caused by fire National
Commission, New Delh M/s National Insurance Co.Ltd.
--- Appellant 3. Claim settlement reached with a third party is not binding on the complainant National Commission, New Delhi
Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
... Petitioner 4. Repudiation of mediclaim based on the plea that the disease was pre-existing is not justified. NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
... Petitioner 5. After a insurance claim is made in time, the Insurance Company cannot refute the claim for its own delay NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
M/s National Insurance Co. Ltd.
--- Appellant 6. Even in case of breach of condition of policy, the insurer has to pay 75% of the claims National Commission, New
Delhi Kesarben
--- Petitioner 7. Discharge receipt given to Insurance Company due to financial hardship is not enforceable. National Commission,
New Delhi United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
--- Petitioner 8. Insurance Co. should give good reasons for reducing the claim. Otherwise the insured may lodge a protest immediately on receipt of the reduced claim. National Commission, New Delhi Singareddy Ramana Murty
----- Appellant 9. When the cheque issued towards the premium for a insurance policy gets dishonoured, the Insurance Company is not liable to provide the insurance cover National Commission, New Delhi
Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. .. Petitioner
10. When the owner is ignorant that the license possessed by the driver hired is fake, he cannot be penalised Revision Petition No. 2140 OF 2001 Smt. Kamlesh Rai
.. Petitioner The Supreme Court in its Judgement has contradicted the conclusion of the NCDRC. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
...Appellant(s) Revision Petition No. 2147 OF 2001 Mr. Anil U.Pandey
.. Petitioner 12. In the absence of evidences to support damage
due to accident, Insurance Company was right in disallowing the claim.
NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 50 OF 2013 Captain Brij Mohan … Petitioner Versus New India Assurance Co.Ltd. ... Respondents 13. An insurance claim cannot be paid, unless the
application for transfer is duly made to the insurance company within the
prescribed period.
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD & ANR. ...........Petitioner(s) Versus M/S. M.G. TECHNICALS & ORS ...........Respondent(s) 14. Even in the absence of a licence to drive light
commercial/goods vehicle, but when holding a valid light motor vehicle licence,
the Insurance Company is bound to honour its liability
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ...........Petitioner(s) Versus POSHU RAM @ SESH RAM ...........Respondent(s) 15. Insurance Company penalised for not informing the consumer about the exclusion clause of the policy NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI
REVISION PETITION
NO. 2368 OF 2016
TUNTUN PRASAD SAH ...........Petitioner(s) Versus Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. ...........Respondent(s) 16. Insurance Company can repudiate a claim of
damage or even loss of the vehicle, if it is not registered.
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Petitioner(s) Versus VIKRAM KANDA ...........Respondent(s) 17. Insurance Company directed to pay the compensation
after adjusting for under Insurance
NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus HANSRAJ BAFNA & ANR. ...........Respondent(s) 18. Insurance Company can reject a claim for inordinate
delay in informing it and that too without valid reasons.
NATIONAL COMMISSION,
NEW DELHI
RAMNIWAS ...........Petitioner(s) Versus TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. ...........Respondent(s) Top Read Advantage Consumer, monthly newsletter of Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela. |